.svg)
Recruitment
.svg)
Informazioni sui candidati
1. Competenze tecniche
Mastery of Required Technical Skills:
[Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[Comments on the candidate's technical skills based on real-life situations or practical tests]
1: Candidate does not have the technical skills required for the position.
2: Has basics but would require further training.
3: Has mastered technical skills to a satisfactory level, can complete tasks with minimal supervision.
4: Highly skilled, has solid experience and can manage complex projects or teach skills to others.
5: Expert, exceeds expectations, brings unique skills and can innovate in his or her field.
2. Abilità trasversali
Interpersonal Skills and Communication:
[Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[Comments on the candidate's interpersonal skills, communication, teamwork, adaptability, and stress management]
1: Significant lack of interpersonal skills, difficulties in communication and teamwork.
2: Shows basic skills, but deficiencies are evident in stressful or complex situations.
3: Good level of interpersonal skills, works well in teams, communicates effectively.
4: Very good soft skills, able to manage conflict and motivate teams.
5: Excellent interpersonal skills, natural leader, inspires and uplifts those around him.
3. Esperienza professionale
Relevance and Impact of Experience:
[Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[Comments on the candidate's professional experience, specific examples of achievements, and impact in previous roles]
1: Little or no relevant experience, lack of concrete achievements.
2: Limited experience, some accomplishments but not totally relevant to position.
3: Adequate experience, demonstrated skills and accomplishments relevant to position.
4: Solid experience with significant accomplishments directly applicable to the position.
5: Exceptional experience, exceeds requirements, has successfully led major projects.
4. Motivazione e aspirazioni di carriera
Alignment with Role and Company:
[Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[Comments on the candidate's motivation for the position, career aspirations, and alignment with the company]
1: Little apparent motivation for position or company, aspirations unclear or not aligned.
2: Basic motivation for the position, some career aspirations but lack of clarity or alignment.
3: Good motivation, career aspirations clear and partly aligned with position and company.
4: Highly motivated by position, career aspirations well aligned with opportunities.
5: Extremely motivated, aspirations perfectly aligned with position and company culture.
5. In linea con la cultura aziendale
Cultural Alignment:
[Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[Comments on the candidate's fit with the company's culture and values]
1: Little knowledge or interest in company culture, poor alignment of values.
2: Basic knowledge of culture, some values aligned but obvious incompatibilities.
3: Good understanding of company culture, values generally aligned.
4: Very good fit with culture, shares company values and vision.
5: Excellent fit, candidate embodies company culture and values.
6. Conoscenza dell'azienda e della posizione
Understanding and Preparation:
[Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[Comments on the candidate's knowledge of the company and the position, reflecting their motivation and seriousness]
1: Very limited knowledge of company and position.
2: Basic knowledge, understands the broad outlines but lacks detail.
3: Good knowledge, understands the position well and has done basic research on the company and its main activities.
4: Very knowledgeable, shows a thorough understanding of the business and role, with ideas on how to contribute positively.
5: Exceptional expertise, not only understands the company and position in detail but also brings unique perspectives and impressive preparation.
Valutazione complessiva
Strengths:
[List the candidate's key strengths observed during the interview]
Areas for Improvement:
[List any areas where the candidate could improve or may need additional training]
Overall Impression:
[Average Score between 1-5]
Comments:
[General comments on the candidate's overall performance during the interview]
.svg)
Using an interview evaluation form effectively is crucial for ensuring a fair, consistent, and comprehensive assessment of each candidate. Here’s how to use it in the right way:
Tailor the evaluation form to the specific requirements of the position. Identify key competencies, skills, and attributes that are essential for the role and ensure these are reflected in the evaluation criteria.
Define clear, specific, and measurable criteria for evaluation. Common areas might include technical skills, communication abilities, cultural fit, and problem-solving skills. Ensure each criterion is relevant to the job.
Adopt a consistent rating scale, such as 1 to 5 or 1 to 10, and clearly define what each rating represents. This ensures that all interviewers apply the ratings uniformly, reducing subjectivity and bias.
Ensure all interviewers are trained on how to use the evaluation form. They should understand the criteria, how to apply the rating scale, and the importance of taking detailed notes to justify their ratings.
Design interview questions that align with the evaluation criteria. Include a mix of behavioral and situational questions that allow candidates to demonstrate their relevant skills and experiences.
During the interview, interviewers should take detailed notes on the candidate’s responses. These notes provide context for the ratings and are essential for discussing the candidate’s performance later.
After the interview, hold a debriefing session where all interviewers discuss their ratings and observations. This collaborative review helps ensure that the final evaluation is balanced and considers multiple perspectives.
.svg)
.svg)
