Interview Bias : types, examples and ways to mitigate

Interview bias can undermine your hiring process, leading to unfair decisions and poor team diversity.
But what are they and how to prevent them ?
In this guide, we'll look into the different types of interview bias and their impacts. We'll also explore how you can reduce these biases, to make better hiring decisions.
Interview bias are interviewer's personal prejudices or inclinations influencing their assessment of a candidate. Here are some of the most common biases studied by behavioral researchers:
Confirmation bias occurs when you form an early opinion about a candidate and then look for evidence to support that opinion while ignoring contradictory information.
For example, if you read a positive reference before the interview, you might overlook any negative aspects during the interview itself.
Affinity bias happens when you favor candidates who share similar interests, backgrounds, or experiences.
For instance, if you and a candidate both enjoy the same hobby, you might unconsciously rate them higher, even if the hobby is irrelevant to the job.
The halo effect is when one positive trait of a candidate influences your overall perception of their suitability.
For example, if a candidate is exceptionally well-dressed, you might assume they are also competent and reliable, even without concrete evidence.
The horn effect is the opposite of the halo effect. A single negative trait or mistake, such as a typo on a resume, can disproportionately affect your perception of the candidate's overall abilities.
This can lead to unfairly negative assessments.
Nonverbal bias happens when you give too much weight to nonverbal cues like body language, eye contact, or appearance.
For example, a candidate who maintains poor eye contact might be judged as lacking confidence or honesty, even if their qualifications are excellent.
Similarity bias occurs when you favor candidates who are similar to yourself in terms of background, education, or personality.
This can lead to a homogeneous team and limit diversity of thought and experience.
Cultural noise refers to the bias that occurs when candidates give socially desirable answers instead of honest ones.
You might fail to see through these responses and mistakenly view the candidate as a perfect fit for the company culture.
Gender bias involves making assumptions about a candidate's abilities or fit for a role based on their gender.
This can manifest in various ways, such as assuming a female candidate is less suitable for a technical role or questioning a male candidate's suitability for a caregiving position.
Racial bias involves prejudging candidates based on their race or ethnicity.
This can lead to discriminatory practices where candidates from certain racial backgrounds are unfairly disadvantaged during the hiring process.
Attribution bias occurs when you make assumptions about a candidate's behavior based on your own interpretations rather than objective evidence.
For example, if a candidate arrives late to an interview, you might assume they are disorganized or uncommitted, without considering external factors like traffic or public transport issues.
Interview bias can significantly impact your hiring process. Here's how :
Reducing interview bias requires deliberate actions and ongoing effort. Here are some effective strategies you can implement:
Use a standardized list of questions for every candidate. This ensures consistency and fairness in the interview process.
Studies have shown structured interviews help you focus on job-related criteria and reduce the influence of personal biases. By asking all candidates the same questions in the same order, you can objectively evaluate their responses.
Remove identifying information from applications, such as names, photos, or addresses.
This prevents biases based on gender, race, or age from influencing your decisions. Blind recruitment ensures that candidates are judged solely on their qualifications and experience. This has been shown to increase diversity in hiring.
Develop clear, quantifiable notation for evaluating candidates like scorecards.
Scorecards helps you rate and compare candidates with numbers and coefficients, reducing the influence of personal biases. They provide a clear, consistent method for comparing candidates' skills and qualifications.
Provide regular training on unconscious bias and inclusive hiring practices.
Training helps interviewers recognize and mitigate their biases, which is crucial for creating a fairer hiring process. Training should cover common biases, their impact, and strategies to avoid them.
Involve a diverse group of interviewers in the hiring process.
Different perspectives can help identify and counteract biases. A diverse panel ensures a more balanced evaluation of candidates and promotes a more inclusive hiring environment.
Use behavioral questions to assess candidates' past experiences and actions.
This method focuses on concrete examples rather than hypothetical scenarios. Behavioral interviews provide a more objective basis for evaluating candidates' suitability for the role.
What does bias concretely look like in the real world ?
Here are a some of the most common scenarios you can face as a recruiter everyday :
Scenario: You’re interviewing a candidate who went to the same university as you. During the interview, you find yourself more engaged and enthusiastic about their responses compared to other candidates.
Solution: To counteract this affinity bias, use a structured interview process. Ask each candidate the same questions and focus on their answers rather than shared experiences. Use a diverse hiring panel to provide multiple perspectives and reduce personal biases.
Scenario: A candidate arrives well-dressed and speaks confidently. Impressed by their appearance and demeanor, you overlook gaps in their experience and qualifications.
Solution: Implement interview scorecards to evaluate candidates on specific criteria relevant to the job. This ensures you focus on the candidate’s qualifications and performance rather than their appearance.
Scenario: During an interview, a candidate makes a minor mistake, such as stumbling over a question. You become overly critical and assume they are not competent.
Solution: Use behavioral interview techniques that focus on candidates’ past experiences and actions. Ask follow-up questions to get a complete picture of their abilities. Maintain objectivity by comparing their responses to predefined criteria.
Scenario: You unconsciously assume a female candidate is less suited for a technical role compared to male candidates. This assumption affects your questioning and evaluation.
Solution: Blind recruitment practices can help mitigate gender bias. Remove gender identifiers from resumes before reviewing them. Ensure that interview questions are job-specific and not influenced by gender stereotypes.
Scenario: One of the candidate you're interviewing doesn't look you regularly in the eye and display a closed body language. You diminishes in your mind the perception of his/her competence.
Solution: Focus on job-related skills and experiences. Use a scoring system to evaluate candidates based on their answers rather than their nonverbal behavior. Train interviewers to recognize and mitigate this bias.
You want to reduce bias and conduct fairer interviews ? Noota helps you create a more objective and structured interview process:
You want to significantly reduce interview bias ? Try Noota for free.
You want to know how to conduct exit interviews the right way ? Here's how to do it.
You want to know what a good interview script looks like ? Here's a template and example.
You want to have examples of icrebreaks in your job interviews ? Here's a complete list for you.